<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sandlines &#187; misuse of statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandlines.net/tag/misuse-of-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandlines.net</link>
	<description>Drawing new lines in the shifting sands of marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>88.2% of statistics are made up on the spot</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/made-up-on-the-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandlines.net/made-up-on-the-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandlines</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guinness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misuse of statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vic reeves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Call me unreasonable, but I tend to take the view that if you quote statistics to back up your argument then you should at least have a basic understanding of what they mean&#8230;</p>
<p>I was leafing through the soon-to-be-lamented November &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me unreasonable, but I tend to take the view that if you quote statistics to back up your argument then you should at least have a basic understanding of what they mean&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_401" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 388px"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5in-3BmKtFI"><img class="size-full wp-image-401" title="statistics" src="http://www.sandlines.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Picture-2.png" alt="Picture 2" width="378" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click to play the 1997 Guinness advert</p></div>
<p>I was leafing through the soon-to-be-lamented November issue of Revolution (specifically the Insider Guide to Digital Marketing) when I came across the following quote:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="color: #ff9900;">&#8220;The DMA estimates that marketers gain $45.06 (£28.28) in ROI for every dollar they spend on email campaigns.&#8221;<br />
<em>Mike Hilts, president &amp; general manager, Yesmail</em></span></p>
<p>Now, speaking pedantically, this is factually correct. But so wrong.</p>
<p>This (frequently quoted) statistic is a ratio, that was converted into US dollar terms to help present the finding in meaningful terms to an American audience. So far so good. But why the half-conversion? If it&#8217;s $45.06 to $1, then it&#8217;s £45.06 to £1, right?</p>
<p>To be fair to Mike, he&#8217;s by no means the first to make this error &#8211; but surely as an industry it&#8217;s in our interest to get the facts right?</p>
<p>Unless, of course, Mike is saying that we&#8217;re only getting a little better than 60% of the return in the UK that our trans-Atlantic counterparts achieve? I thought not.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<p><a href="http://www.sandlines.net/?ibsa=share&id=393" id="share-link-">Share</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandlines.net/made-up-on-the-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

