<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sandlines &#187; market research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandlines.net/tag/market-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandlines.net</link>
	<description>Drawing new lines in the shifting sands of marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lies, damned lies and statistics &#8211; part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandlines.net/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandlines</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[market research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google book search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.granitegrok.com/"><img class="alignright" title="questions and answers" src="http://www.granitegrok.com/pix/question%20mark.jpg" alt="" width="301" height="266" /></a>I&#8217;m a bit of a marketing geek &#8211; I freely admit it. In fact, my hiring policy has been based around an idea that a good friend of my wife shared with me a few years back. She believes that &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.granitegrok.com/"><img class="alignright" title="questions and answers" src="http://www.granitegrok.com/pix/question%20mark.jpg" alt="" width="301" height="266" /></a>I&#8217;m a bit of a marketing geek &#8211; I freely admit it. In fact, my hiring policy has been based around an idea that a good friend of my wife shared with me a few years back. She believes that for a man to be attractive he has to have 10% geek: no more, no less. I&#8217;ve successfully applied that principle to building businesses from scratch and it&#8217;s a compelling mix.</p>
<p>But one manifestation of my &#8216;geek&#8217; (frankly I probably knock the 10% ceiling from time to time) is responding to surveys. I guess it stems from wanting to see what marketers are up to and what they&#8217;re asking.</p>
<p>Of course, the cynical view is that surveys will (should) always tell you what you want to hear &#8211; and a big contributory factor sits in <a title="How you ask the question" href="http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZKJzDl1nxLIC&amp;pg=PA65&amp;lpg=PA65&amp;dq=%22how+you+ask+the+question%22+market+research&amp;source=web&amp;ots=fGoOKtSPKk&amp;sig=vn4_gGVD8aUWuslhmPa30YmRKeg&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=3&amp;ct=result" target="_blank">the way the questions are asked</a>. The link is to a result from Google Book Search, btw. There are any number of illustrations of this point if you &#8216;<a title="just Google it!" href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22how+you+ask+the+question%22+market+research&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=">conduct a google search</a>&#8216; to support this further.</p>
<p>But the survey I looked at tonight was a classic case of forcing the answer you want. I was being asked about my view of some sponsored web content. Before I looked at the content, I had to visit the site in question.</p>
<p>During the survey, I was asked if I had visited, enjoyed and would be likely to revisit the content. I&#8217;d visited three of the eight content areas&#8230; but I was unable to continue with the survey unless I ticked a box that said I&#8217;d visited it. I therefore had to lie to proceed.</p>
<p>This is not an uncommon issue: there&#8217;s a tendency in surveys to insist on answers to questions, and it is simply a question of the survey authors not thinking through the options.</p>
<p>Research does, of course, have substantial value&#8230; but please don&#8217;t take it at face value. Sometimes people are less than scruplously honest&#8230; and it&#8217;s not always their fault.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sandlines.net/?ibsa=share&id=248" id="share-link-">Share</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandlines.net/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

