<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sandlines &#187; behavioral targetling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandlines.net/tag/behavioral-targetling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandlines.net</link>
	<description>Drawing new lines in the shifting sands of marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Behavioural targeting and online publishers</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/behavioural-targeting-and-online-publishers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sandlines.net/behavioural-targeting-and-online-publishers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandlines</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online display advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad funded content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral targetling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioural targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discretionary inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a delight to see<a title="Business Week: A Pricing Revolution?" href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc2009045_367596.htm" target="_blank"> well-thought out</a> and <a title="e-consultancy's response" href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/3646-is-behavioral-targeting-breaking-online-publishers-business-model" target="_blank">well-reasoned arguments</a> being put forward about online marketing.</p>
<p>I should declare an interest here &#8211; I&#8217;m VP International for wunderloop, who offer behavioural and other forms of targeting, wrapped in the Connect &#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a delight to see<a title="Business Week: A Pricing Revolution?" href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2009/tc2009045_367596.htm" target="_blank"> well-thought out</a> and <a title="e-consultancy's response" href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/3646-is-behavioral-targeting-breaking-online-publishers-business-model" target="_blank">well-reasoned arguments</a> being put forward about online marketing.</p>
<p>I should declare an interest here &#8211; I&#8217;m VP International for wunderloop, who offer behavioural and other forms of targeting, wrapped in the Connect ad exchange&#8230; so I&#8217;m not exactly impartial.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-349 alignright" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;" title="targeting" src="http://www.sandlines.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/targeting-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="243" height="243" />However, a dozen or so years in online marketing have shown that success of placing campaigns is rarely single-dimensional. In fact I&#8217;d tend to draw it as a compass, with the main axes pointing to geographic, timing (e.g. day and day part), socio-demographic and behaviour/interest based. In the centre of the compass I&#8217;d put context &#8211; because that is always a factor, regardless of the other targeting elements.</p>
<p>How much of a factor depends (at least in part) on the aims of the campaign &#8211; for example: is it the influence of brand associations or is it purely direct response?</p>
<p>Again, this is not a binary question &#8211; there are definite shades of grey.</p>
<p>Either way, what the industry is seeing &#8211; and accelerated by the current economic conditions &#8211; is a shift in buying patterns from premium to discretionary advertising inventory. This is a trend that was happening in any case, but which a softer buying market is accelerating.</p>
<p>Targeting (BT or otherwise) offers benefits on both sides of the media buying/selling equation: buyers can get better placed campaigns to drive whatever measurable benefits the campaign is aimed at; sellers can get a better price for the inventory they select by making sure that they put the right inventory into the mix for their customers.</p>
<p>And what do the audience get?</p>
<p>Content, in one shape or form or another &#8211; and mostly free of charge.</p>
<p>When I started in the online business a dozen or so years ago, my dad would always ask &#8220;yes, but who PAYS for it?&#8221; In the late &#8217;90s, that was a rare question to ask.</p>
<p>Most forms of payment, other than ad-funding, have been gradually debunked: subscriptions models have not really taken off; micro-payments exist but don&#8217;t provide the currency to compensate for the development of web systems or creating content; fees from ISPs have been stripped away, packaged or reduced to commodity pricing. So ad-funding is (for most online content) an inevitability &#8211; as well as very competitive.</p>
<p>Which means that attempts to add value to discretionary inventory are here to stay too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sandlines.net/?ibsa=share&id=347" id="share-link-">Share</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sandlines.net/behavioural-targeting-and-online-publishers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

