<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sandlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sandlines.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sandlines.net</link>
	<description>Drawing new lines in the shifting sands of marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on the iPad and Marketing by Riaz Kanani</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/the-pad-and-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz Kanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=421#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>I assume you mean you need both.. can&#039;t see you keeping an ipad in your pocket ;) ok snark aside - agree with the basic use case but I am left wanting so much more from the ipad.. think it might be something I wait for till the third generation.. or maybe google will release it with their device due at the end of the year.. here is hoping!

As for the marketing side - it is going to be interesting to see if more people interact with the standard types of ads that are on these devices vs the poorly used mobile ads. I think they&#039;ll definitely be more in line with web ad interaction than the ads via the mobile but I am just not convinced that is a good thing.

What we need is a new type of advertising - both inside the iphone and possibly inside these ads. The publishing industry at least is in desperate need ;) albeit the ipad  will allow them to charge for the content freely available on the web (at least today anyhow).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you mean you need both.. can&#8217;t see you keeping an ipad in your pocket <img src='http://www.sandlines.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ok snark aside &#8211; agree with the basic use case but I am left wanting so much more from the ipad.. think it might be something I wait for till the third generation.. or maybe google will release it with their device due at the end of the year.. here is hoping!</p>
<p>As for the marketing side &#8211; it is going to be interesting to see if more people interact with the standard types of ads that are on these devices vs the poorly used mobile ads. I think they&#8217;ll definitely be more in line with web ad interaction than the ads via the mobile but I am just not convinced that is a good thing.</p>
<p>What we need is a new type of advertising &#8211; both inside the iphone and possibly inside these ads. The publishing industry at least is in desperate need <img src='http://www.sandlines.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  albeit the ipad  will allow them to charge for the content freely available on the web (at least today anyhow).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The anticipation of disappointment by Paulo Cunha</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/the-anticipation-of-disappointment/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo Cunha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=409#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>It sounds a lot like &quot;The Game&quot;, great post ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds a lot like &#8220;The Game&#8221;, great post <img src='http://www.sandlines.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Capital Disconnect by Riaz Kanani</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/first-capital-disconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz Kanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=381#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>Looks like marketing never spoke to operations.. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like marketing never spoke to operations.. <img src='http://www.sandlines.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The last mile by Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/the-last-mile/comment-page-1/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=367#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>This is an event I&#039;d actually be very interested in attending - between my (re-visited) career in email marketing, and my interest in social websites in general, it sounds intriguing.  

Social media does mean (as you&#039;ve pointed out on a number of occasions, and via a number of media) that companies no longer are the sole arbiters of what is being said about them, or even on behalf of them.  And, often, it&#039;s the negative that gets publicised - the whistle blowing (or merely disgruntled) employee, the customer who got bad service, the punter who has lost money, the member of public who has read something (even unattributed).  This can serve to really protect the consumer, but it can also lead to unsubstantiated rumours being re-reported as gospel.

Interesting subject!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an event I&#8217;d actually be very interested in attending &#8211; between my (re-visited) career in email marketing, and my interest in social websites in general, it sounds intriguing.  </p>
<p>Social media does mean (as you&#8217;ve pointed out on a number of occasions, and via a number of media) that companies no longer are the sole arbiters of what is being said about them, or even on behalf of them.  And, often, it&#8217;s the negative that gets publicised &#8211; the whistle blowing (or merely disgruntled) employee, the customer who got bad service, the punter who has lost money, the member of public who has read something (even unattributed).  This can serve to really protect the consumer, but it can also lead to unsubstantiated rumours being re-reported as gospel.</p>
<p>Interesting subject!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Howzat for a tweet? by Riaz Kanani</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/howzat-for-a-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Riaz Kanani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=357#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>what? - you mean we can&#039;t control what people see and listen to now?

the world is over surely..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what? &#8211; you mean we can&#8217;t control what people see and listen to now?</p>
<p>the world is over surely..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s the French for &#8216;teaser campaign&#8217; by Sandlines</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/whats-the-french-for-teaser-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=352#comment-888</guid>
		<description>UPDATE
Turns out to have been a bit of a SNAFU. They got &quot;so much traffic&quot; that Google Picassa suspended their account. So if you go to www.nudeinascarf.com you still see the teaser, a mere 2 1/2 hours after the revelation was due to be made. Ooops.

So, I guess the teaser worked to the extent it drummed up interest. And the value to the client... um... I guess if they get enough mainstream coverage they can spin it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE<br />
Turns out to have been a bit of a SNAFU. They got &#8220;so much traffic&#8221; that Google Picassa suspended their account. So if you go to <a href="http://www.nudeinascarf.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nudeinascarf.com</a> you still see the teaser, a mere 2 1/2 hours after the revelation was due to be made. Ooops.</p>
<p>So, I guess the teaser worked to the extent it drummed up interest. And the value to the client&#8230; um&#8230; I guess if they get enough mainstream coverage they can spin it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gmail dot hell by Paulo Cunha</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/gmail-dot-hell/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo Cunha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=337#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you&#039;re just being spammed? Maybe there isn&#039;t anyone holding your email with the dot, it would be interesting if you would try to login to your account using the username with the dot and your password. If it works, then most likely no one else is able to login (unless they know your password)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you&#8217;re just being spammed? Maybe there isn&#8217;t anyone holding your email with the dot, it would be interesting if you would try to login to your account using the username with the dot and your password. If it works, then most likely no one else is able to login (unless they know your password)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social media gets&#8230; well, anti-social by Ross Furlong</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/social-media-gets-well-anti-social/comment-page-1/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Furlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=320#comment-763</guid>
		<description>I disagree entirely, but if you&#039;d like me to agree, that&#039;s fine, we can negotiate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree entirely, but if you&#8217;d like me to agree, that&#8217;s fine, we can negotiate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Apple keep winning by Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/why-apple-keep-winning/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=289#comment-543</guid>
		<description>http://www.luxist.com/2008/08/06/i-am-rich-iphone-app/

You too could have bought an ap for $1000.  It&#039;s been pulled, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.luxist.com/2008/08/06/i-am-rich-iphone-app/" rel="nofollow">http://www.luxist.com/2008/08/06/i-am-rich-iphone-app/</a></p>
<p>You too could have bought an ap for $1000.  It&#8217;s been pulled, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Retail intelligence by Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.sandlines.net/retail-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sandlines.net/?p=299#comment-431</guid>
		<description>I think Amazon have taken a leaf out of ofline marketers.

Amazon was once primarily a bookseller, and it is mostly what I use it for.  However, visiting the home page (whilst I am logged in), I see promotions for thermal shirts, mp3 downloads, speakers, headphones, dvds, trainers (!) - I have to scroll down before I get to books, despite the fact that most of my purchases have in fact been books.  In other words, Amazon have moved my regular purchases, and put popular items deeper in the store.

So perhaps at least some large etailers ARE learning the lessons.

RE offline business - for a more tongue in cheek (yet accurate) take:  http://www.cracked.com/article_16931_dickonomics-how-5-everyday-businesses-trick-you.html - check out number 4 in particular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Amazon have taken a leaf out of ofline marketers.</p>
<p>Amazon was once primarily a bookseller, and it is mostly what I use it for.  However, visiting the home page (whilst I am logged in), I see promotions for thermal shirts, mp3 downloads, speakers, headphones, dvds, trainers (!) &#8211; I have to scroll down before I get to books, despite the fact that most of my purchases have in fact been books.  In other words, Amazon have moved my regular purchases, and put popular items deeper in the store.</p>
<p>So perhaps at least some large etailers ARE learning the lessons.</p>
<p>RE offline business &#8211; for a more tongue in cheek (yet accurate) take:  <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_16931_dickonomics-how-5-everyday-businesses-trick-you.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cracked.com/article_16931_dickonomics-how-5-everyday-businesses-trick-you.html</a> &#8211; check out number 4 in particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
